Fortune Favors The Bold

Details: 485i.com Facebook Twitter
Dec 25
Permalink

NEWS: An incident today on a Detroit-bound Northwest Airlines flight originating in Nigeria…

ME: So the “device” did almost nothing except burn the suspect, everyone on the flight is ok, and it may not have even been remotely possible to take down the plane that way? Plus, there aren’t more than 100 people in the world who would seriously try such a thing, and fewer capable to boot, but there are thousands of flights each hour, right? Great. Good work, security theater! Will be happy to fly again in 4 days. Keep it up.

Permalink
Merry Xmas! I put pants on for you!

Merry Xmas! I put pants on for you!

Permalink
Permalink

The 14 Worst Words For A Designer To Hear

clientsfromhell:

“I’m not sure what I want, but I’ll know it when I see it.”

Still think this takes a backseat to, “I can’t pay you this month.”

Permalink
Dec 24
Permalink
This thing I’ve got against Yahoo! is swiftly becoming a non-laughing matter. This screencap above is a disaster. The headline: non-factual. The players never spoke out against the award; the writer behind the link simply disagrees with their decision. As for the caption: a completely misleading idea due to its ignorance of context. “Writes a blogger?” It’s a Yahoo! writer, writing for a Yahoo! website… The writer isn’t just some linked jerkoff randomly plucked from the Internet! That’s like the Times publishing a dispatch from Sewell Chan and putting a link on the homepage described as, “sent in by some guy on Second Avenue.” Yahoo! published the opinion, and they should not cite their sources as “a blogger.” The correct phrase is, “our staff writer” or “our sports columnist.”
(And if you wonder why I’m in such a froth about this, it’s because they should know better; people don’t trust “bloggers” because mainstream news sources like Yahoo! constantly speak of bloggers as the proverbial fat-guy-in-mom’s-basement-with-an-opinion like we’re in the 80’s, all computer users are socially awkward and odorifically challenged, and all the people with any sort of writing credibility are in newspapers or magazines. This is not just a self-aggrandizing falsehood of the print industry, but it’s also infuriatingly impossible thanks to the fat fucking Baby Boomer generation who mismanaged the print pubs and put an entire younger generation of journalists out of work when the shit hit the fan, eliminating all career growth except for blogs — and now they get paid to run painfully bland shareholder-raping obsolete Internet “portals” like Yahoo! Fuck them sooooo hard for… everything, really.)

This thing I’ve got against Yahoo! is swiftly becoming a non-laughing matter. This screencap above is a disaster. The headline: non-factual. The players never spoke out against the award; the writer behind the link simply disagrees with their decision. As for the caption: a completely misleading idea due to its ignorance of context. “Writes a blogger?” It’s a Yahoo! writer, writing for a Yahoo! website… The writer isn’t just some linked jerkoff randomly plucked from the Internet! That’s like the Times publishing a dispatch from Sewell Chan and putting a link on the homepage described as, “sent in by some guy on Second Avenue.” Yahoo! published the opinion, and they should not cite their sources as “a blogger.” The correct phrase is, “our staff writer” or “our sports columnist.”

(And if you wonder why I’m in such a froth about this, it’s because they should know better; people don’t trust “bloggers” because mainstream news sources like Yahoo! constantly speak of bloggers as the proverbial fat-guy-in-mom’s-basement-with-an-opinion like we’re in the 80’s, all computer users are socially awkward and odorifically challenged, and all the people with any sort of writing credibility are in newspapers or magazines. This is not just a self-aggrandizing falsehood of the print industry, but it’s also infuriatingly impossible thanks to the fat fucking Baby Boomer generation who mismanaged the print pubs and put an entire younger generation of journalists out of work when the shit hit the fan, eliminating all career growth except for blogs — and now they get paid to run painfully bland shareholder-raping obsolete Internet “portals” like Yahoo! Fuck them sooooo hard for… everything, really.)

Permalink
Great Moments in Headlines: “Brink of OK”

Great Moments in Headlines: “Brink of OK”

Permalink

goldenfiddle:

“Up In The Air is bad. It’s a new depression exploitation picture or unemployment porn, but that’s not exactly why it’s a bad film. It’s a bad film because it’s safe and fails to throw any punches. So, George Clooney plays a caddish, single man who doesn’t want to settle down with a troubled past. Hasn’t Clooney played this character in every other film since his career breakout in “E.R.”? Isn’t Ryan Bingham the same character as Michael Clayton? Instead of crazy undercover lawyer shit, Clooney just does crazy firing people shit. Well, there’s a giant difference between Up In The Air and Michael Clayton though; Michael Clayton is a good film.”

Skeet On Mischa

This is a shame; I was going to see Up In The Air hoping for a movie on the level of Michael Clayton. I may use that two hours of movie time instead for filming my Michael Clayton homage.

Permalink
ohhleary:

Del’s Lemonade, now available by the bottle.

Is this what you drink when the weekend editor casually mentions all of the free gifts you happily received at your desk from your advertisers?
**LEMON FACE**

ohhleary:

Del’s Lemonade, now available by the bottle.

Is this what you drink when the weekend editor casually mentions all of the free gifts you happily received at your desk from your advertisers?

**LEMON FACE**

Permalink